His word picture of the 3rd and 10th jurymans displays the impact they may hold on the democratic system.nevertheless the 8th and 9th and 11th jurymans picturing unity and impartial idea counter this. ” such words mirror Rose’s belief that the jury system is strongly reliant on its jurymans ability to disassociate their determinations from their personal beliefs and experiences.showing “we’d be better off if we took these tough childs and slapped ‘em down before they make problem.Tags: Descriptive Essay City Street At NightRush Essay ComplaintsPunk Rock Culture EssayBruce Barton Speeches EssaysMaruti Suzuki Marketing Strategy EssaysEssays On Consumerism In The United StatesStrategy And Implementation Business PlanHow To Write A Biology Research PaperProblem Solving Using Linear Equation
leting him to understand the personal inducement of the aged witness’ possible bearing false witness. ” This demonstrates the 9th Juror’s ability to utilize his ain experiences non to judge others. Fictional characters such as these aid to portray the importance of impartial idea within the jury system.
Through his experience as a adult male defeated by life. undistinguished old adult male who has been nil all his life” may hold testified merely “to be recognized. Reginald Rose’s ‘Twelve Angry Men’ does non simply attack the jury system of 1957.
The tenth Juror shows features similar to those of the 3rd.
nevertheless his opinions are based entirely on the socioeconomic and ethical position of the suspect.
In the play Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose shows that prejudices can prevent jurors from seeing the truth.
This is evident throughout the play as juror 10 blinded to the facts because prejudice clouds his judgement.The New York skyline lying in the dorsum of the room.and the really spareness of the scene offers a changeless reminder of the significance these characters play. but as representations of wider societal groups of twentieth century America. [and having] a streak of sadism." Wrongly, Juror No. Note the way that Juror Ten talks about "'em" and his supposed knowledge of this group of them and their natural deceit.He allows his own personal experiences to intrude into the realm of what should be a dispassionate, objective experience. as he exclaims “They are wild animals/ It’s those people!I’m tellin’ you they let the childs run wild up at that place. ” This statement non merely depicts a deficiency of intelligence. The tenth Juror is so revealed to hold been raised in a similar context.This is used by Rose to mime the societal division of American society. The destiny of the immature and “dangerous killer” appears predetermined from the beginning. it is the 3rd Juror who epitomizes the impression of unfair opinion. Constantly continuing the proceedings of the instance and sabotaging other jurymans.as 11 of the jurymans are already convinced of his guilt. he is determined to see his ill-founded unfavorable judgments put into pattern and have the suspect prosecuted.he simply accedes to the bulk without of all time understanding the impression that he or the informants may be incorrect. a factor jussive mood for his place if justness is to of all time be achieved. a adult male tempered with strength and compassion. Rose presents the reader with a contrasting side of the judicial system. The 8th Juror is able to individual handedly stand against those who use dogmatism and peer force per unit area to coerce their ain distorted sentiments upon others.“It’s non easy for me to raise my manus and direct a male child off to decease without speaking about it first” juxtaposing the 3rd and 10th jurymans.