Bloody Mary Research Paper

Malfatti 1956 provides translations of Spanish and Italian sources concerning Mary’s coronation in 1553 and her marriage in the following year, while the Count of Feria’s vital dispatch from England in Mary’s last days are edited and translated in Rodríguez-Salgado and Adams 1984.

Malfatti 1956 provides translations of Spanish and Italian sources concerning Mary’s coronation in 1553 and her marriage in the following year, while the Count of Feria’s vital dispatch from England in Mary’s last days are edited and translated in Rodríguez-Salgado and Adams 1984.Until recently, the lack of major change in historical approaches to Mary meant that edited collections of essays by specialists were not devoted to her.

Tags: Modern Love College EssaysEnglish Coursework OutlineGoogle Business PlanHigh School Placement Test Essay QuestionsThesis Statement Against Legalizing MarijuanaHow To Write A Business Case Study PaperDissertation Word Count 10000Essay Writing+How To AnalyseSolve Any Math Problems

In England, she has been regarded as bloodthirsty and misanthropic.

Just as she failed to produce an heir from her body, the traditional duty of a queen, so her reign was seen as sterile in political terms.

Ever since she died in London on 17 November 1558, Queen Mary I has had an afterlife in the shadow of her half-sister and successor, Elizabeth I.

She reigned for just over five years, beginning late July 1553, and her time on the throne has been seen ever after as unfortunate and unsuccessful, as well as short.

This is very much a bibliography of work in progress, one of its aims being to show that many opportunities still remain for further valuable and stimulating research into Mary’s life and reign.

Despite the recent upsurge in interest in Mary, the weight of coverage of the Tudor period goes overwhelmingly to the long reigns of Henry VIII and Elizabeth, rather than the short mid-century reigns of Edward and his older half-sister.They are still valuable for older publications, but the current researcher will also need to use this present bibliography as a guide to this developing subject.Elton 1971 provides a scholarly critique of the literature on Mary and her reign up to his time of writing, while Levine 1968 and Read 1978 have similar limitations.Now, however, this lack has begun to be remedied in two important collections.Hunt and Whitelock 2010 explicitly compares Mary and Elizabeth as rulers, while Doran and Freeman 2011 analyzes and compares traditional and revisionist approaches to Mary and her reign.Consultation of the various calendars of English and foreign State Papers, now available online as well as in print, is essential for all who wish to undertake detailed research into the domestic and foreign policies of Mary’s government, as well as many important aspects of the England of her time, together with Wales and Ireland.Equally valuable and indeed essential, especially for coverage of Mary’s seizure of the English throne and her earliest days in power, are various contemporary British and foreign chronicles.Sometimes contradictory, these nonetheless offer insights into English society and politics, as well as foreign attitudes toward England and its queen.The workings of the English government itself are covered in Dasent 1891–1892, Knighton 1998, and Maxwell 1924–1929, while foreign archives have been exploited in the compilation and editing of Tyler 1914–1954 and Brown 1867–1881.Into the 1990s, English-speaking historians mostly continued to put Mary’s “failure” as queen, culminating in the loss of Calais to France at the beginning of 1558, down to her personal inadequacy, possibly resulting from the ill treatment that she received from her father, King Henry VIII, as well as the difficult political and economic circumstances that she had to confront.Since the 1980s, however, the queen and her reign have been looked at again from many aspects.