States are free to impose their own labeling requirements as well, though it seems that most jurisdictions are waiting for federal laws to be implemented before working on new legislation.One thing is for certain: the scientific and political discussions surrounding GMO foods aren't going away any time soon.
When dangerous chemicals are applied, plants use them to grow, and the food itself can be detrimental to our health."Many scientific organizations and industry groups agree that the fear-mongering that runs through discussions of GMO foods is more emotional than factual.
"Indeed, the science is quite clear: crop improvement by the modern molecular techniques of biotechnology is safe," the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) said in a 2012 statement."The World Health Organization, the American Medical Association, the U. National Academy of Sciences, the British Royal Society, and every other respected organization that has examined the evidence has come to the same conclusion: Consuming foods containing ingredients derived from GM (genetically modified) crops is no riskier than consuming the same foods containing ingredients from crop plants modified by conventional plant improvement techniques," according to the AAAS.
A minority of respondents (11.7%) claimed they understood the basic principles of GM technology, while most were either “neutral” or “unfamiliar with GM technology”.
Most respondents (69.3%) obtained their information on GM food through the Internet and 64.3% of respondents thought that media coverage was predominately negative on GM food.
After more than 25 years of research and development on the genetic modification of a wide range of crops for food and fodder, China has reached a decision point as to whether it should accept, reject, or go slow with the use of genetically modified (GM) technology to produce the food and feed needed to sustain its population growth and economic renaissance.
Here, we report a consumer survey on GM food that includes input from all provinces in China."In more than 60 countries around the world, including Australia, Japan and all of the countries in the European Union, there are significant restrictions or outright bans on the production and sale of GMOs."As You Sow is a nonprofit environmental watchdog focusing its research on how corporate actions affect our environment, including food production.According to Christy Spees, a program manager with As You Sow, GMO foods are dangerous "because the modifications are centered around resistance to toxic substances, such as pesticides and certain fertilizers.Post-survey comments of respondents made suggestions on how the industrialization of GM technology might impact the future of China’s food supply and value chains.Finally, the impact of emerging technologies like genome editing and genome-edited organisms (GEOs) on the GM food debate is discussed.For instance, the banana tree is propagated entirely through cloning methods. By far, the biggest use of GMO technology is in large-scale agricultural crops. According to the World Health Organization, one of the most widely used methods for incorporating pest resistance into plants is through Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) genetics, a bacterium that produces proteins that repel insects.At least 90% of the soy, cotton, canola, corn and sugar beets sold in the United States have been genetically engineered. GMO crops that are modified with the Bt gene have a proven resistance to insect pests, thus reducing the need for wide-scale spraying of synthetic pesticides.We support these positions and the FDA's approach."According to GMO Answers, an industry group comprised of Monsanto, Du Pont, Dow Agro Sciences, Bayer, BASF, Crop Science and Syngenta, GMO agricultural products are "by far the most regulated and tested product in agricultural history."Additionally, their website states that "many independent scientists and organizations around the world — such as the U. National Academy of Sciences, United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, World Health Organization, American Medical Association and the American Association for the Advancement of Science — have looked at thousands of scientific studies and concluded that GM food crops do not pose more risks to people, animals or the environment than any other foods."The political issue that GMOs have become is almost as conductive as the scientific debate.However, after much discussion among various lawmakers across the U.Others point to the benefits of sturdier crops with higher yields."GM crops can improve yields for farmers, reduce draws on natural resources and fossil fuels and provide nutritional benefits," according to a statement on the website for Monsanto, the world's largest manufacturer of GMOs.