Such a view is rather an exception in my experience.
Research practices overwhelmingly show a gap in what is deemed scientifically valuable.
Current governance of Arctic research speaks to this credibility gap and extends into policy-making in the North.
I take research governance to include how knowledge is perceived, how research is done (i.e.
This essay was originally published by Northern Public Affairs, an independent, volunteer-run, not-for-profit organization dedicated to mobilizing diverse voices from across the North to analyze and comment on pressing public concerns.
Inuit Of The Arctic Essay Bill Gates Essay Writing
Setting the context: The credibility gap and research governance I joined academia out of the conviction that, by understanding the systems that control our lives as Inuit, I would be able to envision some of the solutions that might change such systems to better suit our realities.I reflect here on some of the tensions and struggles I have experienced when thinking about and conducting Arctic research, as an Inuk raised in Nunavut and as a scholar trained in Western traditions.These tensions are fundamentally rooted in having to deal with what I call the credibility gap between Western knowledge and Inuit knowledge.Who decides on research and on what counts as evidence? If we want comprehensive, deep research and effective policy, with the goal to understand and change rather than represent and be complacent in the status quo, interpretation of data and its validation in policy-making need to support closing the credibility gap.Capacity-building, whether through research or through policy, would then become a two-way street, rather than a unidirectional exercise in knowledge application.At best, it is seen as traditional ecological knowledge (TEK), with a role to supplement and support scientific knowledge in the area of climate change and animal life, for example, or to serve in Inuit adaptation to biophysical changes that affect activities like hunting.In Inuktun, Inuit traditional knowledge is Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit (IQ), which “encompasses all aspects of traditional Inuit culture, including values, world-view, language, social organization, knowledge, life skills, perceptions, and expectations” (Anonymous, 1998: 1, qtd. The literal translation of IQ would be “Inuit way of doing things: the past, present, and future knowledge, experience and values of Inuit Society” (Awa & Tapardjuk, 2002: 4).Research principles have also transitioned from research on Inuit to research with Inuit.However, we have yet to see a turn to research by Inuit for Inuit.In whatever way it is defined, it largely lacks the legitimacy (and credibility) of scientific knowledge.Hunn’s definition that “TEK is knowledge” (Hunn, 19) is closest to the idea that TEK represents a different, not less, way of knowing.