On this theory of personhood, early fetuses are not persons.Tags: Geology Term PapersEducation Problems In Pakistan EssaySolve Math Problems CalculatorJoint Venture Business PlanFreshman Year College Experience EssayCons Cloning Essay
So until fetuses can be removed from women and placed in new wombs, abortion may not violate the rights of fetuses and may be permissible.
The philosophical issue of the moral status of abortion is complex.
The medical and scientific research reports that this developmental stage isn’t reached until after the first trimester, or, more likely, until mid-pregnancy.
But aren’t our futures plausibly valuable, in part, because we can, presently, look forward to them?
Fetuses have no awareness of their futures whatsoever, and this is one important difference between their futures and our futures.
Fetuses, then, might not have a right to the pregnant woman’s body and so she doesn’t violate their rights by not allowing a fetus to use it.
This view appears controversial because people are known to occasionally commit deeds that are apparently evil either out of self-interest or acting on impulse, against their best.
However, when we look at the logics behind human behaviours and motivation, the concept begins to make more sense.
The aim of this essay is to demonstrate how it is possible that nobody does wrong knowingly.
Right and wrong, good and bad are typically associated with human actions, and Socrates has successfully demonstrated that the motivation for every action is self-interest.