You would lack credibility and appear naive and uninformed if your analysis has already been convincingly put forth or refuted.The purpose of a literature review is fourfold: Review the Assignments page to get a sense of how this assignment fits in with the other major assignments this quarter, namely, the Background Essay and the Final Research Article.Introduction: The introduction presents your narrowed topic or area of inquiry, whether from the conclusion of your Background Essay or based on a later formulation, and an overview of the various subtopics, issues, and problems that scholarly researchers have studied (which will also be reflected in the topic sentences of your Summary paragraphs).Tags: Essay On The Thin Red LineLiterature Review For A Research PaperLiterature Review On TransportationFree Printable HomeworkEssay Book EcclesiastesUrban Design Thesis ProjectsBusiness Plan For Website StartupEssay Voice YouthNarrative Essay On Road AccidentsScience In Society As Level Coursework Help
See the "Find scholarly articles" tab from our Holman Library Class Guide.
At least two of your scholarly articles must come from the online database Academic Search Premier (available from the class guide); other scholarly sources can come from Google Scholar, scholarly book chapters (published by university presses), or research studies published by credible organizations.
Here is an example of a thesis statement that evluates the state of research and points to a proposed research question from a former student’s research project on domestic violence in the case of mail-order brides in the U.
S.: "Although there have been many studies of domestic violence against women and programs adopted to reduce it, there are virtually no statistics documenting instances of abuse in the immigrant bride population." Summary (include section heading; 3 paragraphs): The summary-of-sources section presents the research, knowledge, and analysis that the literature offers concerning your narrowed research topic.
The sources should be diverse; you should not have more than two (of the five) articles from the same author or periodical; if you do have more than two from the same author or periodical, then you should have more than the minimum five sources.
Ideally, your collection of scholarly sources should include a variety of social science disciplines as well as different research methods.At least five scholarly articles (must be different from those you used in the BE), from which you quote at least once.At least two articles must come from the electronic database such as Academic Search Premier (select "peer-reviewed" from the search screens of these databases).You may discuss and evaluate the significance of various conclusions and arguments, the completeness of individual studies, the research methods used, substantial areas of disagreement, debates over definitions of terms, and/or the consistency of the results with each other.As you present your evaluation, do so cautiously with thorough analysis and explanation.For example, if you were studying prison reform, one paragraph might present what three scholars have reported regarding education programs in prison, even though one or more of those authors might show up again in another paragraph on visitation rights.If a paragraph happens to focus on only one author or article, make sure this is for a good reason, for example, the article represents the authoritative discussion of a particular issue; in such a case, the content of that paragraph should be limited to the issue and not turn into a general summary of the article.There is, after all, no point in reinventing the wheel, i.e., undertaking a study that someone else has already done or trying to answer a question that has already been adequately explored.And there's also no point in reaching your own interpretive conclusions without taking into account what others have already studied and argued.Do not introduce new articles in this section that you haven't already covered in the Summary section.Please note that even though you may take issue with aspects of the research and findings in your sources, it is very rare for the discussion to include a complete dismissal of any one source.