tables and figures is an effective way to present your results while also keeping your readers engaged.
Watch this video to learn some great tips and tricks to write your results in a compelling way.
An introduction to the research writing process is to help ease the nerves of writing a research paper.
In this guide there will be useful information to help produce a working paper.
The hypotheses have been outlined in the introduction and may have been reiterated at the beginning of the results section.
The Results section is one of the most important sections of your research paper.Be concise, using non-textual elements appropriately, such as figures and tables, to present findings more effectively.In deciding what data to describe in your results section, you must clearly distinguish information that would normally be included in a research paper from any raw data or other content that could be included as an appendix.Twelve Steps to Writing an Effective Results Section. For most research papers in the social and behavioral sciences, there are two possible ways of organizing the results. San Francisco Edit; "Reporting Findings." In Making Sense of Social Research Malcolm Williams, editor. Both approaches are appropriate in how you report your findings, but choose only one format to use.: Just as the literature review should be arranged under conceptual categories rather than systematically describing each source, organize your findings under key themes related to addressing the research problem. It explains what parts the research paper will present such as, methods / materials, results / analysis, discussion, conclusion, and references.The results section is where you report the findings of your study based upon the methodology [or methodologies] you applied to gather information.No colonies were detected on the combination treatment (see Figure 1). Coli strain 4 (EC 4) tended to be the least sensitive overall, as it produced colonies on all treatment plates, even though it was more sensitive to the individual treatments, compared to EC 2 and EC 3 (see Figure 1).. of Chloramphenicol stopped the growth of two strains of E. It also illustrates that the 5 mg/ml of Chloramphenicol had little to no effect on the EC 2 strain of E. Coli as the colony sizes were near maximum of the standard result. The main point of Figure 4 is that a combination of 5 mg/ml of Chloramphenicol and 5 mg/ml Streptomycin can effectively reduce the numbers of EC 4 colonies, compared to only one of the antibiotics being present at any one time shown in Figure 2 and 3 respectively. "These three events planted the seeds of a great change in society, and the effects of this change are being felt at all levels ...Results The following observations were made as a result of experiments conducted by Casey Hospital with respect to four types of E. This shows that 5 mg/ml Chloramphenicol is an effective antibiotic against EC 1 and EC 2 strains of E. FIGURE 4 In these results it has shown that the Casey Hospital should use both 5 mg/ml of Chloramphenicol plus 5 mg/ml of Streptomycin in targeting the four strains of E. Due to EC 4 having resistance to both antibiotics there is need for experimentation in finding an antibiotic which EC 4 is not resistant to. " (Appendix C: Analysis of Analytical Exposition)The above exchanges correspond to the pattern identified by Sinclair and Coulthard as characteristic of teacher-pupil talk with the underlying exchange structure of Teacher Initiation, Pupil Response, and Teacher Feedback. However, the act of articulating the results helps you to understand the problem from within, to break it into pieces, and to view the research problem from various perspectives.The page length of this section is set by the amount and types of data to be reported.